Save flat 35% on Assignment
A) They focused only on crimes committed by Allied forces
B) They did not result in any convictions
C) They established principles of international justice but had limited enforcement
D) They were held before the war officially ended
Correct Answer: C)
They established principles of international justice but had limited enforcement
The Nuremberg trials were the first of their kind trials created to prosecute the war criminals for their atrocities and genocides. However, they were seen as symbolic because
Explore the full range of academic writing services offered by New Assignment Help, tailored specifically for your needs. Because great work deserves the perfect partner, ask any question and get authentic answers from our experts
The Nuremberg Principles are a set of guidelines that define what constitutes an international war crime. It is these principles that continue to influence international laws today. Their relevance shows in their being used in ICC proceedings and UN mandates.
Yes. Critics have called the trials examples of "victor’s justice", as only Axis leaders were prosecuted. The leaders of the Allies who had committed war crimes themselves were not considered by the mandates.
In the first and most famous trial (the IMT), 24 Nazi leaders were indicted. Of those, 12 were sentenced to death, 3 were acquitted, and the rest received prison terms.
Yes. The Nuremberg Trials were the first of their kind in history. It was the first time that the leaders were brought to the official court setting for their crimes against humanity.
Many of the defendants said they were “following orders” to justify their actions during the trials. This excuse was rejected by the tribunal and they were punished. This also prioritized the personal responsibilities beyond the orders.
The trials helped expose the extent of Nazi atrocities to the public and were a crucial step in denazification. However, societal reckoning in Germany took many years beyond the trials.
